« FRANCE: BAYROU, LA VRAIE RUPTURE? | Page d'accueil | MEDIAS : «L’EUROPE, ON S’EN FOUT ET CA FAIT CHIER !» »
samedi, 02 décembre 2006
FRENCH PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS: CLASH AND QUESTIONS
For a long time, mass media try to sell us a second round, opposing the socialist Ségolène Royal and the Christian democrat Nicolas Sarkozy. But what about Jean-Marie Le Pen, leader of the National Front? According to recent polls, the man may at least reach 17% of the suffrages since the first round. 17% is not much, but enough in France to compete for the final countdown. Of course, when facing a socialist, a centrist (François Bayrou) or the leader of the right wing (Nicolas Sarkozy), Jean-Marie Le Pen will probably loose. But the history will remember he reached for the second time the second place on the podium.
How would this be possible in a country such as France? First, because, here, as in any other country, some people do not mind anymore voting for a extreme-nationalist. Everybody knows it: if things go bad, it is of course because of the migrants… Easy and sad thinking of course. But existing. Second, probably because of the need of a clash. A Moroccan guy told me recently that it would maybe not be a bad thing if Le Pen became president. I just told him this idea was crazy, moreover when coming from a migrant. His answer was as follow: “I know, but if this happens, we will have a real clash. Everything may break down. After that, we will be at least able to rebuilt something better!”
As many French, I do not know exactly what to think about this mess. But there is one thing I ama almost sure: the link between the French and their representatives is not at his best. A quite look at the abstention rate shows it, year after year. The blank vote increases also. But nobody really cares at the Elysée or at the National Assembly. Why? Maybe because only the result of a vote is taken into consideration. Whatever very few people have voted for a politician: when elected he says he has the support of the French people… Just because “elected”… Even if they were only 10%, 15% or 20% to support him. Will next presidential elections will change things. Honestly, I doubt it. As said before, when elected… But if no change occurs, who knows what might happen… French people do not ask for much: they just want to live in a democracy which values does not end with its spelling. They want concrete and regular links between themselves and their representatives. Not only every five or six years. They want projects for their country, real citizenship (bringing obligations to them but also rights). They want to be part of the decisions. In one word: no more a monarchy but a democracy. Until this moment, they carry on the debate on the blogs, probably the latest democratic sphere in France. Write about this campaign. Exchange point of views. Try to be heard and to know what other candidates (you do not see on TV shows) may have to propose. Or sing politics, as Khalifa, one of the numerous guys who does not much believe anymore in our system and vote blanks. A vote he wishes one day someone could, in France, take into consideration. Maybe just because this blank vote is not only a piece of better but has a real meaning…
Christophe Nonnenmacher is journalist
15:25 Publié dans CHRISTOPHE NONNENMACHER, CULTURE, ENGLISH EDITION, PODCAST, POLITIQUE | Lien permanent | Commentaires (2) | Envoyer cette note | Tags : france, politics, presidential, sarkozy, royal, bayrou, reggae









Commentaires
I don't live in France, but I wonder how Segolene Royal's ideas about citizen democracy influence dissatisfied French voters. As for being elected without a majority, that is still more democratic than the US, where almost all political races have only 2 candidates.
Ecrit par : Boz | samedi, 02 décembre 2006
Boz,
+1 ;-) It is always better as in the US. But in France there is now 30 years we have the same people at the top of the State. Just try to imagine Bush or Clinton in place for that time... Royal, Sarkozy and Bayrou are not completly new, but a lot of more than Chirac, Jospin or Fabius (socialist party for the two last). The question is now: will those "new" leaders will bring a new breath in politics? I mean by that that French people are quite fed up with having no possibility to influence major decisions. Just take the example of the EU: Since the ratification of the Maastricht Treaty (1992), allowing the single currency, nobody cared about what people could have thought about the european construction. Some people (national governments, MEP and EU commissioner) decided by themselves it was a great thing to enlarge the EU and give the opportunity to 10 new members to join us. But nobody asked the people. Those last one had no choice. Same thing now for Bulgaria and Romania. The leitmotiv just seems to be: "keep up enlarging, its sounds good for business. Whatever the people may think, we don't bother. We know, they do ot know or are unable anyway to understand what is good or not for them". French politics (the art to do politics) is about the same. We have an expression in France which says: "Dictature is 'shut up', democracy 'keep on talking'". All what the French want is remember our leaders that democracy can be something else, something where the citizen have the right to get involved in major decisions, during the elections but also inbetween. If 2007 brings no change, we may live quite social and political difficult days.
Christophe
Ecrit par : christophe | samedi, 02 décembre 2006
Ecrire un commentaire