EUROPEUS

(By Ari Melber / Source: Campaign Matters - USA) Barack Obama has the hottest campaign website, according to the new Nielsen ratings. His site drew over 700,000 unique visitors in July, while Hillary Clinton and John Edwards drew just under 440,000 and 350,000, respectively. Yet all three Democratic candidates are creaming the Republican field online.Out of the declared G.O.P. candidates, Rudy Giuliani led with a measly 124,000 unique visitors in July – one sixth of Obama's traffic. To make up the gap, Republican candidates are spending more on web advertising. John McCain and Mitt Romney lead in "sponsored" traffic, while Dennis Kucinich leads Democrats on that score. Fred Thompson's presidential announcement also sparked huge interest online, as TechPresident's Patrick Ruffini reports this weekend. But does it even matter if voters see these campaign sites?

(Read on) 

The US Presidential Election is unquestionably the most popular election the world-over. Many leaders and countries traditionally use it as a reference to justify their own democratic culture. This is not just because of its beauty and entertainment, but more so because whoever is elected will become one of the worlds best known public figures. Whoever is elected will a rare opportunity to be able to change or influence any major situation in the world. To say the least, whoever is elected will become the most powerful leader on earth, with even more ability to influence world situations than the UN’s Secretary General.

In Ovi magazine, sometimes serious, occasionally with a humorous feeling, we have often written that it is about time for the superpower to have a woman president and, with a real twist of luck, Sen. Hillary Clinton has announced her intentions to be a candidate in the next American presidential elections emphasizing that “I’m in it to win!”